CPA TCP Study Guide: Blueprint, Topics and a Study Plan
TCP has the highest pass rate on the exam, and that number is doing less work than it looks. What the blueprint weights, how much of REG carries over, and a seven-week plan that starts the week REG ends.

TCP passed 79.53% of the candidates who sat it in the first half of 2026. No other section is within twelve points, and read as a difficulty ranking it says TCP is the easy Discipline. Some candidates choose it on that basis and discover that the number was never about them.
The number describes a cohort: mostly people who work in US tax, who picked the Discipline that matches their job, and who usually sat it in the first window after passing REG. A candidate in Riyadh who has never filed a US return can join that cohort on paper. The 79% does not follow them in.
What TCP covers
| Area | Weight | What sits inside it |
|---|---|---|
| I. Tax Compliance and Planning for Individuals and Personal Financial Planning | 30 to 40% | Nonroutine individual compliance (equity compensation, alternative minimum tax), passive and at-risk loss limits, gift tax, year-end planning and estimated payments, retirement plans, investments, education funding, insurance |
| II. Entity Tax Compliance | 30 to 40% | C corporation loss utilisation, noncash distributions and liquidations, consolidated returns, income sourcing, S corporation and partner basis, partnership elections and ownership changes, trusts, tax-exempt organisations |
| III. Entity Tax Planning | 10 to 20% | Entity choice, formation and liquidation compared across entity types, planning for each type from the entity's side and the owner's |
| IV. Property Transactions (disposition of assets) | 10 to 20% | Like-kind exchanges and involuntary conversions, Section 1231 character and netting, installment sales, related-party sales and imputed interest |
Areas I and II are 60 to 80% of the paper between them, and the Blueprint's own word for the line between TCP and REG is nonroutine. REG describes its tax areas as routine and recurring transactions. TCP is the transactions a reviewer gets handed rather than a preparer: the noncash distribution, the ownership change, the client asking whether to accelerate income or defer it. Even Area IV, the familiar-looking part, is new ground: REG's 2026 property area is basis and cost recovery, and what happens when the asset leaves is examined here.
Two 2026 details matter. The Blueprint effective January 2026 dropped the IC-DISC, FDII, BEAT and GILTI regimes from TCP, leaving income sourcing as the only international topic, and the AICPA has ruled that the 2025 tax act's 2024 and 2025 provisions became testable in REG and TCP from July 2026. Confirm which law applies to your window before you learn a threshold.
The skill allocation is the opposite of REG's
TCP allocates roughly 5 to 15% Remembering and Understanding, 55 to 65% Application and 25 to 35% Analysis, with no Evaluation component.
REG puts 25 to 35% of its paper at the recall level. TCP puts about a third of that. In REG, learning the rules properly pays directly. Here the rules are assumed, and the marks are for using them on a scenario with several moving parts.
How the exam is built
| Item | TCP |
|---|---|
| Length | 4 hours |
| Multiple choice questions | 68, in two testlets of 34 |
| Task-based simulations | 7, in testlets of 2, 3 and 2 |
| Score weighting | 50% MCQ, 50% TBS |
| Testing availability | First month of each quarter only: January, April, July, October |
| 2026 pass rate | 79.53% cumulative |
| Skill allocation | Remembering and understanding 5 to 15%, application 55 to 65%, analysis 25 to 35%, no evaluation items |
| Passing score | 75 on a 0 to 99 scale |
| Credit window | 30 months from the score release of your first passed section, adopted board by board |
Sixty-eight questions and seven simulations is a lighter load than REG's 72 and 8, so the time goes to the simulations. The Blueprint says the section incorporates verifying the completeness and accuracy of source data used to prepare returns, so expect at least one simulation that hands you a document set and asks whether the schedule prepared from it is right.
The quarterly window changes the cost of a bad day: a Discipline score arrives roughly six to seven weeks after the window closes, and a fail in October is not retaken before January.
Why the highest pass rate is doing less work than it looks
The AICPA is explicit that scores are scaled so the exam is not harder or easier to pass at different times. If difficulty is held constant by design, the spread between sections is a difference in who is sitting them, not in what they are sitting.
| Period | TCP | REG |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 73.91% | 62.61% |
| 2025 | 77.65% | 63.12% |
| 2026, first two quarters | 79.53% | 66.78% |
Three things about the TCP cohort explain most of the gap. Nobody is assigned a Discipline, so the people sitting TCP are disproportionately those whose working day is US tax. They usually sit it within a window or two of passing REG, so the basis and entity mechanics TCP assumes are still fresh. The rise since 2024 is visible in every section, which is a candidate population adapting to a new format, not a paper getting easier.
None of that makes TCP a bad choice. It makes the pass rate a bad reason. CPA Exam Pass Rates by Section, and What They Actually Tell You shows the same effect across all six sections.
What carries over from REG, and what is new
Roughly half of TCP is REG material pushed one step further. The other half is topics the 2026 REG Blueprint does not mention at all.
| Topic | In REG | In TCP |
|---|---|---|
| Basis of property bought, gifted, inherited or converted to business use | Yes, Area III | Assumed; every Area IV computation starts from it |
| C corporation, S corporation and partnership income and owner basis | Yes, Area V | Assumed; TCP adds noncash distributions, liquidations, elections and ownership changes |
| Passive activity and at-risk loss limits | No | Yes, Area I |
| Gift tax and the unified transfer tax system | Basis of gifted property only | Yes, Area I |
| Personal financial planning: retirement, investments, education, insurance | No | Yes, Area I |
| Consolidated returns, loss limits after an ownership change, income sourcing | No | Yes, Area II |
| Trusts, and unrelated business income of exempt organisations | Types of exempt organisation only | Yes, Area II |
| Entity choice, formation and liquidation compared | S corporation eligibility and elections only | Yes, Area III |
| Like-kind exchanges, involuntary conversions, Section 1231, installment sales, related parties | No | Yes, Area IV |
Estate tax deserves a specific word, because older material treats it as a full topic. The 2026 TCP Blueprint has no estate tax group. Gift tax is examined in full, including the unified credit and the marital deduction; the estate appears only as a planning consequence, which asset to gift to minimise a donor's future estate and how beneficiary designations affect what passes to whom.
The topics that decide the result
Personal financial planning is the genuinely foreign part
For a candidate in the Gulf this is the strangest material on the paper. Traditional and Roth IRAs, 401(k) plans, annuities, qualified tuition programmes, life and long-term care insurance: there is no Saudi analogue, no personal income tax to plan around, and a GOSI contribution is not a retirement account with a tax election attached. The saving grace is the skill level: the tasks are to understand advantages and disadvantages, compare plan options in a schedule and calculate a return net of tax, which is decidable once the vocabulary is learned as the rules of a foreign system.
Passive and at-risk: the order is the answer
A loss from a pass-through entity passes the owner's basis limit first, then the at-risk limit, then the passive activity limit, and only what survives all three is allowed; a rental owned directly starts at the at-risk limit. Suspended amounts carry forward, and passive ones release on disposition. The Blueprint's own representative task is to review a basis schedule and confirm the split between the amount suspended for at-risk, the amount suspended as passive, and the amount allowed.
Entity planning's comparisons are Analysis, and they are two-sided
Area III asks for the tax implication of a proposed transaction to both the entity and the owner, across entity types, compared. Take the comparison table you built for REG and add three columns: formation with noncash property, a noncash distribution, and liquidation.
Property dispositions, properly this time
Like-kind exchanges are realised gain, recognised gain, deferred gain and the basis of what you received, in that order, with boot the thing that turns deferred into recognised. Section 1231 is a netting process with recapture in front of it. Installment sales are a gross profit percentage applied each year. Related-party sales disallow the loss and give the buyer a later use for it. The recall pockets around them, trust types, consolidated return requirements, gift exclusions, are cheap to secure early and should be left alone until the final week.
Why a Gulf candidate should normally pick BAR instead
Prepito's standing advice for a candidate in Saudi Arabia or the wider Gulf is BAR unless you work in tax or IT audit, and the TCP Blueprint is the reason rather than the exception. Everything in Area I's planning half is about a US taxpayer's life: US retirement accounts, US education savings, a US estate. Nothing in the section touches Zakat, GCC VAT or withholding on payments to non-residents. A reporting or audit professional in Riyadh or Dubai will use almost none of it.
The exception is precise. If your desk is US tax work, whether expatriate returns, a US-parented group's compliance or a US tax practice in the region, you are the cohort that produced the 79%, and REG then TCP in the first available window is the most efficient pairing on the exam. A narrower case is the candidate who passed REG well above 75 and found the entity material natural; for them TCP is cheaper in hours than BAR, which is a legitimate reason as long as the pass rate was not the reason.
Everyone else should read Which CPA Discipline Should You Choose: BAR, ISC or TCP? and the CPA BAR Study Guide: Blueprint, Topics and a Study Plan. If REG itself is the obstacle, How to Study REG When You Have Never Filed a US Tax Return is written for that.
A seven-week plan that starts the week REG ends
Sit your Discipline second or third, never last, because a retake costs a full quarter. The efficient order is REG immediately before TCP: book REG for the last weeks of the month before your window and start TCP the following week without waiting for the score. Twelve to fifteen hours a week is the shape; the credit-window arithmetic is in Sequencing the CPA Exam Around the Discipline Windows.
| Week | Focus | Why here |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Area IV: like-kind exchanges, involuntary conversions, Section 1231 netting, installment sales, related parties | The most REG-like area, and basis is freshest now. |
| 2 | Area I compliance: passive and at-risk limits, equity compensation, alternative minimum tax, estimated payments and year-end planning | Extends the individual sequence from REG. The ordering rules are the marks. |
| 3 | Area I: gift tax, then personal financial planning | No REG parent and no Gulf analogue. A whole week, not fragments. |
| 4 | Area II: C corporations, loss utilisation, noncash distributions and liquidations, consolidated returns, income sourcing | The largest entity block, and where REG's basis work pays. |
| 5 | Area II: S corporations, partnerships, elections and ownership changes, trusts, exempt organisations | Trust types are recall; trust income, the distribution deduction and ownership changes are computation. |
| 6 | Area III: entity choice, formation and liquidation compared, planning for each entity type | Its comparisons are Analysis-level, its calculations Application; it needs Areas II and IV secure first. |
| 7 | Simulations under time, then one full mock | Half the score. Rehearse the document-review simulations specifically. |
Two rules specific to TCP:
- Learn the timing rule, not the thresholds. Candidates are not tested on amounts indexed to inflation, a question uses real dates wherever timing changes the treatment, and otherwise the current year's law applies. Know how a rule operates and which year's version is being asked for.
- Practise reviewing, not only preparing. Several TCP tasks are review tasks: confirm a basis schedule against its source data, check a consolidated return, find the misallocated loss. Prepared schedules with one error in them are the closest practice to the real simulations.
Where to practise this
Prepito's TCP course covers the full Blueprint with practice questions, timed simulations, full explanations and mistake review, in English, and the REG course is the foundation it assumes.
CPA questions and written explanations are in English. Prepito’s interface is available in English and Arabic, and the AI tutor can respond in either language.
If the tax route is still undecided, start with the REG study guide. For the whole qualification, see the CPA programme.
Sources: AICPA CPA Exam Blueprints effective January 2026, including the summary of 2026 revisions and the note on testing H.R. 1, and AICPA guidance on Exam scoring and pass rates. Blueprint weightings are ranges and are revised periodically, and the tax law eligible for testing changes by window; confirm the current Blueprint and the AICPA policy on new pronouncements for your window. Pass rates cited are cumulative for the first two quarters of 2026.
Try 5 questions on this material
Question 1 of 5
Charitable contributions that exceed the applicable AGI percentage limits in the current year may generally be carried forward for how many years?


